Practical Application Guide
Home > Guides > Practical Guide
Overview
This guide provides real-world application strategies for the HUMMBL Framework across different problem types and contexts.
Quick Reference by Tier
Tier 1: Simple Problems
Approach: Apply standard procedures
Methods:
- Use checklists and templates
- Follow proven methods
- Focus on execution
- Minimize complexity
Base-N Recommendation: Base6
Examples: Equipment maintenance, basic scheduling, standard procedures
Tier 2: Complicated Problems
Approach: Engage experts, use systematic analysis
Methods:
- Break problems into components
- Apply domain expertise
- Use project management
- Follow engineering principles
Base-N Recommendation: Base6-Base12
Examples: Software development, construction projects, system implementation
Tier 3: Complex Problems
Approach: Experiment, adapt, learn
Methods:
- Iterative experimentation
- Monitor feedback loops
- Adapt continuously
- Build resilience
Base-N Recommendation: Base12-Base24
Examples: Organizational change, market strategy, ecosystem management
Tier 4: Wicked Problems
Approach: Engage stakeholders, embrace trade-offs
Methods:
- Multi-stakeholder dialogue
- Deliberative processes
- Incremental improvements
- Accept inherent trade-offs
Base-N Recommendation: Base24-Base36
Examples: Education reform, healthcare policy, urban planning
Tier 5: Super-Wicked Problems
Approach: Global coordination, long-term commitment
Methods:
- Coalition building
- Adaptive governance
- Process innovation
- Long-term commitment
Base-N Recommendation: Base36-BASE120
Examples: Climate change, pandemic response, global inequality
Implementation Workflow
Step 1: Assess (Wickedness Scoring Tool)
- Score your problem (0-30 points)
- Identify tier classification
- Understand complexity characteristics
Step 2: Select (Base-N Architecture)
- Choose appropriate model set
- Match to your learning level
- Align with problem demands
Step 3: Apply
- Use tier-matched methods
- Engage appropriate stakeholders
- Apply selected mental models
Step 4: Monitor & Adapt
- Track outcomes
- Reassess complexity as you learn
- Adjust approach as needed
Common Scenarios
Scenario: Implementing New Process
Initial Assessment:
- Stakeholder agreement: Medium → 3 points
- Information: Mostly complete → 2 points
- Solution finality: Needs refinement → 3 points
- Learning: Some adaptation → 3 points
- Time pressure: Moderate → 3 points
- Total: 14 points = Tier 2
Recommended Approach:
- Use Base12 models
- Systematic project management
- Engage domain experts
- Plan for iteration
Initial Assessment:
- Stakeholder agreement: Divergent views → 5 points
- Information: Hard to measure → 4 points
- Solution finality: Never truly “done” → 5 points
- Learning: Continuous experimentation → 5 points
- Time pressure: Important, not urgent → 2 points
- Total: 21 points = Tier 4
Recommended Approach:
- Use Base24-Base36 models
- Deep stakeholder engagement
- Iterative, incremental changes
- Accept ongoing nature
Role-Specific Guides
Practitioners: Detailed professional guide
Learners: Learning pathways guide
Researchers: Academic applications guide
Additional Resources
Core Framework:
Reference:
← Back to Guides