Researchers Guide
Home > Guides > Researchers
For Academic & Applied Researchers
This guide outlines research opportunities and methodologies for validating and extending the HUMMBL Framework.
Research Opportunities
Empirical Validation
BASE120 Model Validation:
- Current status: 9.1/10 quality (October 2025)
- Opportunities: Field testing, refinement
- Methods: Case studies, comparative analysis
Tier Classification Reliability:
- Inter-rater reliability studies
- Test-retest stability
- Construct validity assessment
Base-N Selection Effectiveness:
- Cognitive load measurements
- Learning outcome studies
- Expert performance comparisons
Theoretical Extensions
New Problem Dimensions:
- Beyond current 5 questions
- Domain-specific assessments
- Cultural variations
Learning Progression:
- Developmental trajectories
- Transfer effects
- Expertise acceleration
Integration Studies:
- Combination with existing frameworks
- Meta-framework development
- Cross-domain applications
Research Methods
Quantitative Approaches
Survey Research:
- Wickedness scoring reliability
- Base-N usage patterns
- Practitioner outcomes
Experimental Studies:
- Training effectiveness
- Decision quality improvements
- Performance outcomes
Longitudinal Studies:
- Learning progression tracking
- Skill development patterns
- Long-term impact
Qualitative Approaches
Case Study Research:
- Deep dives into specific applications
- Process documentation
- Outcome analysis
Ethnographic Studies:
- Practitioner communities
- Implementation contexts
- Adaptation patterns
Interview Research:
- Expert perspectives
- Novice learning experiences
- Implementation challenges
Current Validation Evidence
BASE120 Validation (October 31, 2025):
- Models Validated: 120
- Quality Score: 9.1/10 average
- Transformations: 6 complete
- Status: ✅ Release-ready
See: Full Validation Evidence
Research Collaboration
HUMMBL, LLC Partnership Opportunities
Areas of Interest:
- Empirical validation studies
- Domain-specific adaptations
- Training effectiveness research
- Tool development
Contact:
Publication Opportunities
Academic Venues
Relevant Journals:
- Decision Sciences
- Organizational Behavior
- Complexity Theory
- Problem Solving Research
- Educational Psychology
Conference Presentations:
- Decision Sciences Institute
- Academy of Management
- Complexity Science conferences
- Educational research forums
Practitioner Publications
Professional Journals:
- Harvard Business Review
- Sloan Management Review
- McKinsey Quarterly
- Domain-specific publications
Citation
Citing the Framework
APA Style:
Bowlby, R. (2025). HUMMBL Unified Tier Framework v1.0: Integrating Problem
Complexity, Learning Progression, and Base-N Architecture. HUMMBL, LLC.
BibTeX:
@techreport{bowlby2025hummbl,
title={HUMMBL Unified Tier Framework v1.0: Integrating Problem Complexity,
Learning Progression, and Base-N Architecture},
author={Bowlby, Reuben},
year={2025},
institution={HUMMBL, LLC}
}
Attribution Requirements
See Attribution page for complete details on:
- Framework components
- Academic foundations
- AI contributions
- Proprietary elements
Research Ethics
When Conducting Studies:
- Obtain necessary IRB approvals
- Respect intellectual property
- Provide appropriate attribution
- Share findings with community
When Publishing:
- Credit framework appropriately
- Acknowledge prior work
- Share methodology openly
- Contribute back to framework
Funding Opportunities
Potential Sources:
- NSF Decision, Risk & Management Sciences
- Organizational research grants
- Educational research funding
- Foundation grants for complexity research
See Also
← Back to Guides
Part of the HUMMBL Unified Tier Framework v1.0