HUMMBL-Unified-Tier-Framework

Validation Evidence

Home > Reference > Validation Evidence


BASE120 Mental Model Validation

October 31, 2025 Validation Study

Status: ✅ Release-ready
Models Validated: 120
Quality Score: 9.1/10 average
Scope: Complete BASE120 framework


Framework Components

6 Transformations

  1. Perspective (P) (20 models) - How we see and frame problems
  2. Inversion (IN) (20 models) - Reverse assumptions
  3. Composition (CO) (20 models) - Combine parts into wholes
  4. Decomposition (DE) (20 models) - Break wholes into components
  5. Recursion (RE) (20 models) - Iterate, feedback, self-reference
  6. Meta-Systems (SY) (20 models) - Coordinate systems-of-systems

Total: 120 models across 6 transformations


Quality Metrics

Average Quality Score: 9.1/10

Distribution:

All models meet release criteria (≥8.0/10)


Validation Methodology

Assessment Criteria:

Review Process:


Research Foundation

Academic Foundations

Wicked Problems:

Super-Wicked Problems:

Complexity Theory:


Ongoing Validation

Next Steps:

Research Opportunities: See Researchers Guide


Citations

Framework Citation

APA:

Bowlby, R. (2025). HUMMBL Unified Tier Framework v1.0: Integrating Problem 
Complexity, Learning Progression, and Base-N Architecture. HUMMBL, LLC.

BibTeX:

@techreport{bowlby2025hummbl,
  title={HUMMBL Unified Tier Framework v1.0: Integrating Problem Complexity, 
         Learning Progression, and Base-N Architecture},
  author={Bowlby, Reuben},
  year={2025},
  institution={HUMMBL, LLC}
}

Academic Foundations

Wicked Problems:

Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of 
planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155-169.

Super-Wicked Problems:

Levin, K., Cashore, B., Bernstein, S., & Auld, G. (2012). Overcoming the 
tragedy of super wicked problems: constraining our future selves to ameliorate 
global climate change. Policy Sciences, 45(2), 123-152.

See Also


← Back to Reference


Part of the HUMMBL Unified Tier Framework v1.0